Heat, drought, flood, and famine. The unmistakable signs of climate change are all around us. The International Energy Agency has warned that to avert severe consequences from global warming, the world must significantly reduce its consumption of oil, coal, and natural gas while accelerating the adoption of clean energy sources like wind and solar power. But as the world grapples with this urgent climate crisis, the stock market appears to be operating in a parallel universe.
Instead of rallying behind clean energy, the stock market has delivered a blow to a wide array of clean energy companies. Clean energy sectors, including solar, wind, and geothermal power, are facing a substantial decline in their stock values.
In stark contrast, the largest U.S. oil companies, Exxon Mobil and Chevron, are making moves that could further deepen their involvement in the fossil fuel industry. Both companies have recently announced acquisitions that will significantly boost their oil reserves. Exxon is set to acquire Pioneer Natural Resources, a major shale drilling company, for a whopping $59.5 billion, while Chevron is planning a $53 billion purchase of Hess, a prominent integrated oil firm. These moves represent enormous bets on oil's long-term future.
The irony of this situation is clear. Overwhelming evidence points to carbon emissions warming the planet, yet the stock market seems to be downplaying the significance of the clean energy sector and favoring big oil companies.
This discrepancy between the market's behavior and the climate science can be explained by Benjamin Graham's adage: "In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is a weighing machine." In the short term, the market is prone to snap judgments and myopic thinking. It often takes time for it to align with reality.
The scientific consensus on climate change is overwhelming. Recent studies have repeatedly warned that we are running out of time to prevent catastrophic warming. The International Energy Agency has called for an aggressive shift away from fossil fuels to avert disaster. A study highlighted that the planet might have a little over five years before exceeding the ambitious target set by the Paris climate agreement. Should we breach this limit, we will face consequences far more severe than those we have experienced so far.
Despite these warnings, the stock market has yet to fully embrace the clean energy revolution. The iShares Global Clean Energy E.T.F., which tracks the clean energy sector, has suffered losses of over 30% this year and over 50% since the start of 2021. Narrower sectors, such as solar and wind energy, have experienced even more significant declines, with losses of up to 60% in the same time frame.
Rising interest rates have elevated costs and dampened consumer enthusiasm in many countries, leading to reduced stock valuations for fast-growing companies that may not be highly profitable yet. This has particularly affected renewable energy firms, despite substantial investments in renewable projects worldwide.
As climate change accelerates, the stock market's response appears to be at odds with the urgency of the situation. Only time will tell whether the market will pivot to reflect the immediate need for clean energy or continue to bet on big oil.
In a world grappling with the consequences of climate change, the stock market's direction holds profound implications for the planet's future.
Source: The New York Times